“As she sees issues, we’re all inexorably trapped in a basically racist society, with the unique sin of slavery and the historic subjugation of Black People nonetheless figuring out our lives right this moment,” Justice Thomas wrote, including that “on her view, nearly all of life’s outcomes could also be unhesitatingly ascribed to race.”
In a footnote in her dissenting opinion, Justice Jackson dismissed the critique. “Justice Thomas’s extended assault responds to a dissent I didn’t write,” she stated, including that his opinion “additionally demonstrates an obsession with race consciousness that far outstrips my or U.N.C.’s holistic understanding that race is usually a issue that impacts candidates’ distinctive life experiences.”
Justice Thomas’s opinion was hanging, Professor Murray stated. “Components of his concurrence learn as a Black elder chiding and chastising an errant Younger Turk who has publicly contradicted him and failed to point out him enough deference,” she stated. “It’s nearly as if he expects racial solidarity from her and is put out when it’s not forthcoming within the method he anticipated.”
The principal dissent within the case, from Justice Sonia Sotomayor, was simply as vigorous because the one from Justice Jackson. “However Thomas’s hearth is just not geared toward Sotomayor,” Professor Murray stated. “It’s reserved for Jackson.”