An essay about overcoming racial discrimination might be permitted, as a result of it “clearly signifies that the applicant has grit, that the applicant has overcome some hardship,” Mr. Strawbridge advised the justices. “It tells you one thing in regards to the character and the expertise of the applicant apart from their pores and skin shade.”
Isiaah Crawford, president of the College of Puget Sound, stated he hoped the court docket would agree with Mr. Strawbridge on that time.
“We definitely do consider that pupil candidates ought to have a First Modification proper to have the ability to discuss their background in the event that they select to take action,” Dr. Crawford stated.
If dialogue of a pupil’s race had been absolutely barred, he stated, a white applicant to an Ivy League college would possibly be capable of write about being the kid of an alumna, whereas a Black pupil won’t be capable of “to speak about his or her background, whose grandparents weren’t let into colleges just like the Ivy League, and the way that has impacted their selections.”
The Frequent App will proceed to gather racial info for its personal functions, like taking a look at tendencies in purposes amongst totally different teams, no matter how the Supreme Courtroom decides, Ms. Rickard stated. As a result of the nonprofit doesn’t admit college students, it’s unlikely to be a goal of litigation.